tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9437268.post2938863427981754309..comments2009-10-08T10:28:14.691-04:00Parke Wildehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17098394318544229984parke.wilde@gmail.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9437268.post-8481034916837078072009-10-08T10:28:14.691-04:002009-10-08T10:28:14.691-04:00He who has the gold rules. Whichever side of whatever issue, it is the gold, held individually or collectively.<br /><br />&quot;Controversy erupts over Michael Pollan&#39;s Poly lecture&quot; - Kathy Johnston<br />http://newtimesslo.com/news/3411/controversy-erupts-over-michael-pollans-poly-lecture/ <br /><br />&quot;Bentham vs. Hume&quot; - David Brooks<br />http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/06/opinion/06brooks.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9437268.post-10479266078733291672009-10-02T21:07:07.944-04:002009-10-02T21:07:07.944-04:00It is interesting, though, that they seem to have a genuine comment section. The policy student in me wants to know why this site would post critical comments while another astroturf site might not?Parke Wildehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17098394318544229984noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9437268.post-12419298099378873362009-10-02T18:13:29.673-04:002009-10-02T18:13:29.673-04:00Oops, my tag didn&#39;t work. I meant, this firm:<br />foodchaincommunications.comBig Hazelhttp://aworldinitsplaces.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9437268.post-14937222777821427692009-10-02T18:10:20.449-04:002009-10-02T18:10:20.449-04:00It looks like this &quot;truth in food&quot; site is a form of advertising for <a href="foodchaincommunications.com" rel="nofollow">this public relations firm.</a> They&#39;re make their (very comfortable, I&#39;m sure) livings from stuffing and fighting straw dummies, and probably have no plans to resort to thoughtful dialogue (which pays much worse).Big Hazelhttp://aworldinitsplaces.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com