In an interview with Jayson Lusk, author of the Food Police, the Casual Kitchen blog today asks: 'Why is it that many food policy advocates strongly dislike the phrase "personal responsibility"?'
Jayson's answer, expressing a balanced sense of personal responsibility combined with awareness of environmental influences, is fine. It is worth adding that many food policy advocates talk about "personal responsibility" all the time. Just do a search for "Michelle Obama" and "personal responsibility." You will find the topic thoroughly covered by the Cato Institute (an institution rarely accused of being part of the "Food Police"!). You will find a lively discussion of how much the Obamas emphasize "personal responsibility" in tough non-pandering commencement speeches. The Obamas' views, with a mix of personal responsibility and public purpose, sound a lot like Jayson's.
The Casual Kitchen, and Jayson too, can win arguments any time they like against the almost satirically narrow-minded caricature of the "Food Police" that they have set up. But, perhaps it will become boring after a time to knock down row upon row of carnival dolls sitting on a shelf. If so, they will want to engage in greater detail the issues that Michelle Obama raises in her speeches for the "Let's Move" campaign. Here is a good speech to begin with.